Appellant sought to withdraw an RFA after counsel conceded the appeal would not lie before the High Court. Permission granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file before the appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~93
Through: Mr. Aditya Dewan, Advocate
versus
ASHOK MITTAL .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
AUGUST 6, 2024 g.joshi
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:11:08
Birma Devi @ Brahmo Devi (Deceased) through LR
Ashok Mittal
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
