Disposed

Susheela Devi @ Sheela Devismt & Ors. v. Smt Asha & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Aug 2024RFA/482/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellate court disposed of the appeal with liberty to the appellants to pursue the amendment of the site plan before the trial court, noting the limited nature of the grievance and leaving all rights and contentions open.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to appellants to take appropriate steps before the learned Trial Court regarding the amended site plan.

Susheela Devi @ Sheela Devismt & Ors. Vs Smt Asha & Anr. — Partition | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~83

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 482/2024

¶4

SUSHEELA DEVI @ SHEELA DEVISMT & ORS. .....Appellants

¶5

Through: Mr. Ashok Popli and Mr. Mahtab Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SMT ASHA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for R- 1 and 2 with R-1 and 2 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

O R D E R % 05.08.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 44367/2024 [Exemption from filing certified copies, true typed copies of dim annexures]

¶12

Allowed, subject to the Appellants filing certified, true typed copies of the dim annexures within a period of four weeks.

¶13

The Application stands disposed of.

¶14

RFA 482/2024

¶15

The grievance of the Appellants is limited.

¶16

3.1 Learned Counsel for the Appellants submits that although the Impugned Judgment dated 17.05.2024 passed by the Rohini Courts in CS DJ 58333/16 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Judgement”] has found the Appellants to be entitled to 1/5^th share to the suit property bearing House No.1, Panaudyan, Narela, Delhi, the judgment has been passed without taking into account a revised site plan filed by the Appellants/Plaintiff.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:29:54

¶18

Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that they had filed an Application under Order VI Rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to take on record an amended site plan. However, the Impugned Judgment was passed without taking into consideration this Application.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Respondent appearing on advance service submits that the suit was instituted in the year 2011 and that he has no objection to the said Application being adjudicated by the learned Trial Court.

¶20

With the consent of parties, the Appeal is taken up for hearing and disposal today. Since the grievance of the Appellants is limited to the extent that the amended site plan be examined, the Appeal is disposed of, granting the liberty to the Appellant to take appropriate steps before the learned Trial Court, for the same in accordance with law.

¶21

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open in this regard.

¶22

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶23

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶24

AUGUST 5, 2024/pa

¶25

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:29:55

Susheela Devi @ Sheela Devismt & Ors. v. Smt Asha & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Susheela Devi @ Sheela Devismt & Ors. v. Smt Asha & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdev Vs Smt. Kusum & Anr.

Radhey Govind Rohatgi Vs Subhash Chand Chhabra & Anr.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs Suresh Singh Gaur

Chanchal Bisht Vs M/S. Fortis Hospital & Anr.

Kishan Kumar Vs Rajender Prasad

M/ S Baba Vishwanath Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shri Shiv Shankar Mishra