Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the review petition due to settlement of disputes. The review petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw review petition; review petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
RADHEY GOVIND ROHATGI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arpit Sharma, Adv. (through VC)
versus
SUBHASH CHAND CHHABRA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. with Mr. Suraj Jaiswal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
% 02.08.2024 REVIEW PET. 298/2023
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
AUGUST 2, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/08/2024 at 12:26:38
Radhey Govind Rohatgi
Subhash Chand Chhabra & Anr.
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
