Dismissed
S.M. Asif & Anr. v. Virender Kumar Bajaj
Delhi HCRFA/387/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after appellants failed to appear on second call.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 387/2023, CM APPL. 24971/2023 & CM APPL. 44085/2023
¶4
S.M. ASIF & ANR. ..... Appellants
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
VIRENDER KUMAR BAJAJ ..... Respondent
¶8
Through: Mr. Kunal Kher, Advocate.
¶9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶10
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellants even on second call. It seems that the appellants do not wish to pursue this matter any further.
¶11
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶12
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.M. ASIF
- appellant
ANR.
- respondent
VIRENDER KUMAR BAJAJ
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court