Petitioner withdrew his writ petition seeking liberty to pursue the matter afresh before the Labour Court; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty granted.
Liberty to withdraw and file afresh before the Labour Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
Through: Ms. L Gangmei and Ms. Surbhi Bagra, Advocates.
versus
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MASS COMMUNICATION & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Aror, CGSC, Mr. Subhrodeep Saha and Mr. Kushal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Arnav Kumar (CGSC), Mr. Gurdas Khurana, Advocates for UoI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 14.02.2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press the instant petition, at this stage, and seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh before the Labour Court in accordance with law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 rk/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:09:40
VIKAS KUMAR SENGER
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MASS COMMUNICATION
ANR.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
