Petitioner failed to appear to take passover or an adjournment. Court dismissed petition for non-prosecution as petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-43
M/S GREAT EX-SERVICEMAN SERVIC ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
AMIR JHA & OTHERS .....Respondents
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called.
It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter further. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2024 gs/av
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:10:40
M/S GREAT EX-SERVICEMAN SERVIC
AMIR JHA & OTHERS
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
