An appeal was dismissed by the Delhi High Court for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on four consecutive dates despite the matter being called.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-88
RAJINDER VIR HANDA .....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
RAGHUBIR HANDA
.....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjiv Bahl and Mr.Eklavya Bahl, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 17.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:22:56
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
DECEMBER 17, 2024 Nc/sp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:22:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the appellant's consistent failure to appear.
Rajinder Vir Handa
Raghubir Handa
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
