Dismissed
Jai Bhagwan v. Azad Singh
Delhi HCRFA/15/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular first appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after the appellant failed to appear on five consecutive listing dates despite notice through cause lists and display boards.
What did the court decide?
None; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-19
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 15/2009
¶4
- JAI BHAGWAN
¶5
.....Appellant Through: None. versus AZAD SINGH .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM:
¶6
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶7
O R D E R % 16.12.2024
¶8
- None has appeared for the appellant despite the matters being called out on various dates i.e., 13.11.2024, 22.11.2024, 03.12.2024, and 10.12.2024.
¶9
- The daily cause list published on the website of this Court clearly reflects a note for advocates and litigants that regular matters mentioned in the cause list shall be taken up after the supplementary and advance list is over. The physical display Board of this Court as well as the virtual display Board also clearly reflects that regular matters are being called and taken up for hearing.
¶10
- Despite aforesaid, it is disheartening to see that for the matters listed in the regular list, neither the advocates nor the litigants are appearing before this Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Jai Bhagwan
- respondent
Azad Singh
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court