Dismissed
Baldev Raj v. Bhagwan Dei
Delhi HCRC.REV./26/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court held that once possession of tenanted premises is restored to the landlord via warrant of execution, the revision petition becomes infructuous and is dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition along with pending applications dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 26/2024 & CM APPL. 4723/2024, CM APPL. 53773/2024 BALDEV RAJ .....Petitioner
¶4
- Through: Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Ms. Shivani Kotaria with Mr. Baldev Raj, Advocates
¶5
versus BHAGWAN DEI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Mittal and Ms. Bhawna Nanda, Advocates (through VC)
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
- HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
¶8
- % 13.09.2024
¶9
- The counsel for the petitioner stated that the possession of the tenanted premises has already been restored back to the respondent in execution of the warrant of possession.
¶10
- This Court has already taken the view in the judgment dated 26.07.2024 passed in RC.REV. 284/2023 titled as Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons V Shri Ajay Khurana that if the possession of the tenanted premises is restored back to the landlord in execution of warrant of possession, then the revision petition is not maintainable.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether a revision petition under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC remains maintainable after the possession of tenanted premises has been restored to the landlord.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Baldev Raj
- respondent
Bhagwan Dei
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court