Dismissed
Kamlesh Garg v. Mohan Lal
Delhi HCRC.REV./25/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner did not appear for hearing on the specified date nor on the last date. The Court dismissed the petition in default and for want of prosecution, finding the petitioner not interested in prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 25/2023, CM APPL. 4512/2023, CM APPL. 41915/2024 & CM APPL. 41916/2024
¶4
KAMLESH GARG .....Petitioner Through: None
¶5
versus
¶6
MOHAN LAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
¶8
% 13.09.2024
¶9
- None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case is called out for hearing at about 12:45 PM.
¶10
- None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on the last date of hearing also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecution of the present petition.
¶11
- Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications, stands dismissed in default as well as for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Kamlesh Garg
- respondent
Mohan Lal
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court