The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal and connected application as withdrawn. The petitioner stated that vacant possession of the tenanted premises was handed over to the respondent.
The present petition along with pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
SH VINOD KUMAR MIDHA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Archana Midha, Advocate
versus
SH S SOHAN SINGH .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R % 12.09.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 j
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:53:03
SH VINOD KUMAR MIDHA
SH S SOHAN SINGH
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
