Dismissed
Chand Babu v. Mohd Sadiq
Delhi HCRC.REV./23/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing or on the previous date. The order decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~26
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 23/2024, CM APPL. 4060/2024 & CM APPL. 10668/2024
¶4
CHAND BABU .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
MOHD SADIQ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar Pandey, Advocate
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
¶10
% 11.12.2024
¶11
- None appears for the petitioner. There was no presence on behalf of the Petitioner on the last date of hearing as well.
¶12
- In view of the above, the petition is dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Chand Babu
- respondent
Mohd Sadiq
Coram
AI extract
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court