Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kulmohan Singh Vs Lalita Gangwal — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

Home
Delhi HC
2024
Kulmohan Singh Vs Lalita GangwalKulmohan Singh v. Lalita Gangwal

Dismissed

Kulmohan Singh v. Lalita Gangwal

Delhi HC11 Dec 2024RC.REV./143/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition was dismissed in default as petitioner's counsel was absent despite twice calling the matter. The pending application was also closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Kulmohan Singh v. Lalita Gangwal, RC.REV./143/2020 (DEL), decided on 11 December 2024.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The present petition was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice. The pending application is also declared closed. No substantive legal principle is laid down.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

$~101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- RC.REV. 143/2020 & CM APPL. 43582/2021

KULMOHAN SINGH .....Petitioner

Through: None.

versus

LALITA GANGWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. H.P. Aditya, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 11.12.2024

Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord, on the last date of hearing, had pointed out that the possession of the subject premises stood restored to the Respondent/landlord and that nothing further survives in the present matter. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord seeks to rely upon the order dated 05.12.2024 passed by this Court.

On 05.12.2024, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner sought time to take instructions.

None appears for the Petitioner today, despite the matter being called out twice.

Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed in default. Pending application also stand closed.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

DECEMBER 11, 2024/ ha

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:33:41

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kulmohan Singh
respondent
Lalita Gangwal

Coram

AI extract

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 11 Dec 2024 · December
Registered: 16 Mar 2020
Case no.: RC.REV./143/2020
CNR: DLHC010162212020
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Tara Vitasta Ganju

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Tara Vitasta Ganju

Meera Jain (Since Deceased Thr Lrs) & Ors. Vs Sanjay Jain & Anr.
9 Dec 2024
Yashpal Vs Neelam Sethi through Lrs
9 Dec 2024
M/S S G Kapoor & Co. Vs Mahender Kumar Chawla & Anr.
9 Dec 2024
Chand Babu Vs Mohd Sadiq
11 Dec 2024
Noor Ahamd & Anr. Vs Mohd Sadiq
11 Dec 2024
Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. Vs Vijay Bhatia and Ors.
11 Dec 2024Writ Petition (Civil)