Yashpal v. Neelam Sethi through Lrs
Delhi HCRC.REV./55/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Non-compliance with previous order; petitioner granted two days to comply.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
$~90
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 55/2024
¶4
- YASHPAL .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv.
¶6
- versus
¶7
NEELAM SETHI THROUGH LRS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pranav Rishi and Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advs.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 18.12.2024
¶12
- The order dated 09.12.2024 passed by this Court has not been complied with by the Petitioner. The Petitioner seeks two days’ time to comply with the same.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
YASHPAL
- respondent
NEELAM SETHI THROUGH LRS
Coram
AI extract
TARA VITASTA GANJU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court