Allowed

Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. v. Vyagrah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC20 Nov 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/906/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed an application under Sections 29-A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the arbitral tribunal's mandate by one year from 11.10.2024 to complete proceedings and pass an award as parties were still recording evidence.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of Arbitral Tribunal extended by one year from 11.10.2024 for completion of proceedings and passing of award.

Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Vyagrah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 906/2024

¶4

MBL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Ms. Sonika Singh, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

VYAGRAH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakansha Kaul, Advocate CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R

¶8

% 20.11.2024

¶9

I.A. 45648/2024 (for exemption under Section 151 of CPC, 1908)

¶10

Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application is disposed of.

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 906/2024

¶13

This is a petition under Sections 29-A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act of 1996’) seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of one (1) year w.e.f. 11.10.2024 for completion of arbitral proceedings and making the arbitral award.

¶14

Issue notice.

¶15

Ms. Aakansha Kaul, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the Respondent. Ms. Kaul was directed to appear in Court in view of the fact that she is representing the Respondent in the arbitral proceedings. She states that she has no instructions in the matter.

¶16

The parties state that the matter is pending at the stage of recording of

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 906/2024

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:27:45

¶21

evidence. The witnesses of the claimants stand examined and it is the witnesses of the Respondent, who are being examined presently.

¶22

Having considered the averments made in the petition, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for completion of arbitral proceedings and for passing an arbitral award is extended by a period of one (1) year w.e.f. 11.10.2024.

¶23

The petition is disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid terms.

¶24

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶25

NOVEMBER 20, 2024/ rhc/ms

¶26

Page 2 of 2

¶27

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 906/2024

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:27:45

Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. v. Vyagrah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. v. Vyagrah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sidharth Sawhney Vs M/S French Bakery Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Religare Finvest Limited Vs Konti Infrapower and Multiventures Private Limited and Ors.

Premier Thermotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Ginni Global Limited

Indo Asiatic Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Ginni Global Limited

M/S Bharat Rail Automations Pvt. Ltd. Vs Northern Railway & Anr.

Eurasian Minerals and Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nitya Niranjan Khampariya

Pnc Infratech Limited Vs National Highway Authority of India

M/S Shri Ram Electrical Works Vs Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

Sheikh Badrul Abidin & Anr. Vs Manzoor Ul Islam and Ors.

Anita Seth Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sterlite Technologies Limited Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

X Vs Https Www Hostiserver Com and Ors.

Jaibir Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

F1 Info Solutions and Services Private Limited Vs Nexstgo Company Limited