Petition under Section 29A sought extension of an arbitral tribunal's mandate for disputes under a 2008 Project Agreement. Respondent consented; mandate extended by one year from 11.09.2024 and petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
NCC LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh and Ms. Suparna Jain, Advocates.
versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mahip Singh, Ms. Maitri Singh and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 23.09.2024
Page 1 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 749/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:17
period of one year w.e.f. 11.09.2024.
in these terms.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 SS/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 749/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:17
1 issue framed by the court
Should the mandate of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating disputes under the Project Agreement dated 22.05.2008 be extended under Section 29A?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NCC LTD.
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
