The Delhi High Court appointed Ms. Samiksha Godiyal as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondent under an MoU dated 29.06.2021, pursuant to Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Appointed Ms. Samiksha Godiyal as sole arbitrator and directed arbitration under DIAC rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
M/S ARUSH INFRA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nandini Singh & Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocates. [Enrol No. D/13371/2022, Mobile No. 8447155949, 9899641617]
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 20.09.2024
Page 1 of 2
ARB.P. 1014/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:18:35
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 ‘pv’/
ARB.P. 1014/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:18:35
2 issues framed by the court
Whether disputes between the parties arising under a Memorandum of Understanding can be referred to arbitration under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Whether a sole arbitrator can be appointed when the parties do not agree on the name.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
VINOD KRISHNA
M/S ARUSH INFRA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
