Petition under Section 29(A)(5) seeking extension of time to complete arbitral proceedings. Respondent had no objection subject to expeditious completion; court extended the period by six months with consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
Through: Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. (through v/c)
versus
PROVIDENT HOUSING LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lzafeer Ahmed B.F, Mr. Siddharth Naidu and Mr. Sachin Dubey, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
IA No.40503/2024 (seeking leave to file dim documents)
IA No.40504/2024 (delay of 07 days in re-filing the OMP)
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 757/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:11:00
been completed.
SACHIN DATTA, J
SEPTEMBER 26, 2024/ cl
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:11:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29(A)(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 should be extended?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jag Mohan Chhabra & Ors.
Provident Housing Ltd
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
