Petition for extension of arbitral tribunal mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning disputes under a 2008 Project Agreement. Respondent raised no objection; mandate extended by consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mahip Singh, Ms. Maitri Singh and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 23.09.2024
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 748/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:10
period of one year w.e.f. 06.09.2024.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 SS/
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 748/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:23:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NCC Ltd.
Steel Authority of India
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
