Petition for arbitration permission withdrawn due to technical defect (no notice under Section 21). Liberty granted to file afresh.
Liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SHRIRAM AUTOMALL INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Puneet Raj, Ms. Mamta Garg and Mr. Ravi Shankar, Advocates.
versus
ANKIT SINGH ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 08.04.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 8, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:40:35
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shriram Automall India Ltd
Ankit Singh
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
