Allowed

Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S Mrinmaye Trading and Movers Pvt. Limited

Delhi HC23 Jan 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/431/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months to conclude final arguments in a dispute between the Central Warehousing Corporation and M/S Mrinmaye Trading and Movers Pvt. Limited.

What did the court decide?

Arbitrator's mandate extended by six months; parties directed not to take unnecessary adjournments.

Central Warehousing Corporation Vs M/S Mrinmaye Trading and Movers… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~37

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 431/2023

¶4

CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate with Mr. Anshuman Choudhary and Mr. Sahib Patel, Advocates (M: 9971382986).

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S MRINMAYE TRADING AND MOVERS PVT. LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sonia Dube, Ms. Shurbhi Anand and Ms. Saumya Sharma, Advocates (M: 9810700109).

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 23.01.2024

¶9

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶10

This is a petition by the Petitioner- Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. The arbitral proceeding arises out of an agreement dated 26^th October, 2016, wherein CWC engaged the Respondent as the Service provider for operation and management of CWC’s Railside Warehouse Complex, Ghaziabad. Clause (xxiii) of the said agreement is the dispute resolution clause and provides for resolution of the disputes and differences arising out of or in any way touching upon or concerning the agreement through Arbitration.

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 431/2023

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:12:30

¶14

Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter is at the final stage and final arguments are to be heard by the ld. Arbitrator.

¶15

Accordingly, given that the arbitration is at the stage of final arguments, the mandate of the Arbitrator is extended by another six months from today. It is made clear that parties shall not take unnecessary adjournments before the ld. Arbitrator.

¶16

The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶17

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶18

JANUARY 23, 2024 mr/am

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 431/2023

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:12:30

Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S Mrinmaye Trading and Movers Pvt. Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S Mrinmaye Trading and Movers Pvt. Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mcl - Bel (Jv) Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

Montecarlo Limited Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

M/S Ascent Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Logix Heights Pvt. Ltd.

Tecpro Systems Ltd. Vs NTPC Ltd.

M/S. Singh Constructions Vs Union of India

M/S Dilbag Singh Contractor Vs Union of India

Rajeev Chahal and Anr. & Anr. Vs Kiaasa Retail Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Global Buildwell Vs Pushpa Jain

National Highways Authority of India Vs Pnc Raebareili Highways Private Limited

Montecarlo Limited Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

Ircon International Limited Vs M and Co. Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. (M and Co. in Short)

Ovington Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Smt Upasana Mishra & Anr.

Jairaj Developers LLP Vs Prit Pal Singh & Anr.

Fiitjee Ltd. Vs Deepak Solanki and Anr.