Petition under Section 29A for extension of the arbitrator's mandate in a pending arbitration at the evidence stage. With the respondent's consent and no objection to extension itself, the Court extended the mandate by nine months from expiry on 29.10.2023, requesting expeditious disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
GH CRANES INDIA PVT LTD
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pawan Prakash Pathak and Mr. Monu Kumar, Advocates.
versus
ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yaman Kumar and Ms. Sabah Iqbal Siddiqui, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 18.01.2024 1. Fresh petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitrator.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:16:24
Tribunal was extended for six months by mutual consent of the parties w.e.f 01.09.2023. The mandate of the learned Arbitrator has expired on 29.10.2023.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:16:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitrator should be extended under Section 29A after its expiry on 29.10.2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
GH Cranes India Pvt Ltd
ISGEC Heavy Engineering Limited
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
