Disposed

M/S Bansal Construction Co. v. Union of India

Delhi HC18 Jan 2024ARB.P./65/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes under a 2014 agreement with Union of India. The court found a valid arbitration agreement existed and appointed a retired District & Sessions Judge as sole Arbitrator, leaving all objections including limitation to be raised before him.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Vinay Kumar Gupta, Retd. District & Sessions Judge, as Sole Arbitrator; objections left to be raised before the Arbitrator.

M/S Bansal Construction Co. Vs Union of India — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 65/2024, I.A. 1165/2024

¶4

M/S BANSAL CONSTRUCTION CO.

¶5

..... Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. S.W. Haider and Ms. Pooja Dua, Advocates.

versus

UNION OF INDIA

..... Respondent

Through: Ms. Uma Prasuna Bachu Sr. Panel Counsel along with Ms. Samiksha G.P and Mr. Vidya Sagar Gupta SSE/CPW.

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

% 18.01.2024

¶14

Fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent has appeared on advance Notice and accepts Notice of the petition.

¶16

It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that the Department has objection the appointment of the Arbitrator on the ground that in terms of the Agreement, the petitioner has failed to claim appointment of Arbitrator within the prescribed time limit of 90 days under Clause 64 of GCC, 1999 and therefore, their demand for referring the matter to Arbitrator cannot be accepted.

¶17

Submissions heard .

¶18

Admittedly, there is an Arbitration Clause in the Agreement dated

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:06:15

¶21

23.05.2014 entered into between the parties. Any challenge on merits or in regard to invocation of arbitration may be taken by either party before the learned Arbitrator without prejudice to their rights and contentions.

¶22

Considering that there is a valid Arbitration Agreement between the parties and in the light of the facts and discussions, Mr. Vinay Kumar Gupta, District & Sessions Judge (Retd.), Mobile No.9910384701, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶23

The parties are at liberty to raise their respective objections before the Arbitrator.

¶24

This is subject to the Arbitrator making necessary disclosure as under Section 12(1) of A&C Act, 1996 and not being ineligible under Section 12(5) of the A&C Act, 1996.

¶25

The fees of the learned Arbitrator would be fixed in accordance with the Fourth Schedule to A&C Act, 1996 or as consented by the parties.

¶26

Learned counsels for the parties are directed to contact the learned Arbitrator within one week of being communicated a copy of this Order to them by the Registry.

¶27

A copy of this Order be also forwarded to the learned Arbitrator, for information.

¶28

The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

¶29

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶30

JANUARY 18, 2024/va

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:06:15

M/S Bansal Construction Co. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bansal Construction Co. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Vijay Kumar Bansal Vs Sh. Bhimsen Bansal & Ors.

Rajesh Sabharwal Vs M/S. Rajasavi Estate & Developers & Ors.

Sh Sanjay Bansal Vs M/S Gangotri Enterprises Ltd.

Gh Cranes India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Isgec Heavy Engineering Limited

Hdfc Limited Vs Dr. Parvez Ali Ahmed and Ors.

Onkar Nath Bhalla & Sons Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India