Allowed

Rajender Jaina HUF v. M/S Muller Martini (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC16 Jan 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/27/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitions filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate. Allowed due to respondent's consent; mandate extended by one year and lapsed period regularized.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by one year from today; lapsed period from 11.10.2023 regularized.

Rajender Jaina HUF Vs M/S Muller Martini (India) Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~38 & 39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 27/2024

¶4

RAJENDER JAINA HUF ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Adv. (VC).

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S MULLER MARTINI (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None.

¶8

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 28/2024

¶9

DR. ER. RAJAINDERR JAINA ..... Petitioner

¶10

Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Adv. (VC).

¶11

versus

¶12

M/S MULLER MARTINI (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None.

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

% 16.01.2024

¶17

By way of the present petitions filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks an extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of one year for concluding the Arbitral proceedings and passing the Award.

¶18

It has been submitted that the respondent has been served. However, none has appeared.

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 14:44:01

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at the bar that the learned counsel for the respondent has given his consent for the extension of the mandate.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 11.10.2023.

¶23

Learned counsels for the petitioner submits that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of cross-examination of the respondent‟s witnesses.

¶24

Considering the aforesaid request and as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned counsel for respondent has given his consent, the present petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of one year from today. Further, the period lapsed from 11.10.2023 till date is regularised.

¶25

The present petitions stand disposed of.

¶26

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶27

JANUARY 16, 2024/AR..

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 14:44:01

Rajender Jaina HUF v. M/S Muller Martini (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajender Jaina HUF v. M/S Muller Martini (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prayagraj Power Generation Company Ltd. Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.

Ansal Housing Limited Vs Samyak Projects Private Limited & Anr.

Pnc Infratech Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Vivek Aggarwal and Anr. Vs Mr Hemant Aggarwal & Ors.

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited Vs Paarth Infrabuild Private Limited

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs Nhpc Limited

Bliss Habitat Private Limited Vs Indiabulls Infraestate Limited

Imagine Realty Private Limited Vs Indiabulls Infraestate Limited

Union of India Vs M/S Ramji Das Dhal Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Hero Fincorp Ltd. Vs Mr Gaganmeet Singh & Anr.

M/S Advance Inrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Gail(India) Limited & Anr.

Rishabh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ovington Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Alihasan

Khera Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs B.K.Bansal