Disposed

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited v. Maharishi Dayanand Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited

Delhi HC9 Apr 2024ARB.P./334/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11(6) petition seeking appointment of an arbitral tribunal for disputes under an agreement for supply, installation and commissioning of an electric substation for a housing project. With both parties consenting to reference, the court appointed a sole arbitrator and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Disputes referred to arbitration; Siddhartha Sharma, Advocate appointed sole arbitrator; parties to approach arbitrator within two weeks.

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited Vs Maharishi Dayanand… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 334/2024

¶4

BRILLTECH ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms.Sagarika Kaul, adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

MAHARISHI DAYANAND CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through:

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 09.04.2024

¶10

I.A. 5423/2024 (exemption)

¶11

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

ARB.P. 334/2024

¶14

By way of present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘ A&C Act’ ), the petitioner seeks appointment of Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a sole arbitrator, to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.

¶15

The parties have entered into an agreement dated 20.08.2022 for the for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of 11 KV/0.415 KV Electric Substation including Ancillary Work for its housing project at B - 4,

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2024 at 12:19:17

¶17

Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110070. The tender and clause 33 of the tender in contract document contains the arbitration clause.

¶18

The petitioner has claimed that this court has territorial jurisdiction as the works at Delhi.

¶19

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that though he has filed a reply but the same is not on record on account of delay of two days in filing the same. The delay is condoned.

¶20

Let the reply be brought on record.

¶21

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection if the matter is referred to arbitral tribunal without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent and keeping all the contentions open.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondent has also submitted that it may also be brought on record that the respondent vide order dated 27.02.2024 in O.M.P. (COMM) NO. 131/2023) has deposited a sum of Rs. 25,35,758/- in the form of FDR.

¶23

Considering that both the parties have consented to the reference to the arbitral tribunal, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶24

i) The disputes between the parties under the said agreement are referred to the arbitral tribunal.

¶25

ii) Sh. Siddhartha Sharma, Advocate (Mob. 7400111111) is appointed as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between parties with respect to agreement.

¶26

iii) The place of arbitration shall be in Delhi or any other place as Arbitrator may decide, in accordance with the provisions of the

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2024 at 12:19:17

¶29

Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 and any statutory amendments thereof.

¶30

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference. The fees of the Arbitrator shall be in accordance with the IVth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act or as the parties may agree.

¶31

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claims, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶32

vi) The parties shall approach the learned arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶33

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶34

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶35

APRIL 9, 2024/K/ht..

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2024 at 12:19:17

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited v. Maharishi Dayanand Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited v. Maharishi Dayanand Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Loveen Khosla Sole Proprietor of M/S K Sales Ser Vs Union of India

Taurant Projects Ltd. Vs Gail India Ltd. and Anr.

Satakshi Contractors Private Limited Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Limited

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Vs Sanjay Passi & Ors.

Amardeep Builders Vs Delhi Development Authority

Orix Leasing and Financial Services India Ltd. Vs Ankit Gulliya