The Delhi High Court entertained a petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act seeking an extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate, which the tribunal extended from October 2, 2023 to September 2, 2024.
The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended by another six months till 2nd September, 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Ms Pallavi Kumar, Advocate (M: 9667178576).
versus
JSW STEEL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Ms. Aarushi Tiku and Mr. Vikram Choudhary, Advocates (M: 9711813562).
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R
% 27.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:19:27
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2024 mr/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:19:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the three-member arbitral tribunal should be extended by six months as the matter is at the stage of final arguments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharat Petroresources Limited
JSW Steel Limited
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
