The High Court of Delhi extended an interim order regarding status quo on landed property, originally passed in 2018, to include subsequent purchasers added as respondents later, and closed the appeal.
The interim order dated 21.05.2018, made absolute on 28.11.2019, was extended to respondent nos. 4 to 6 and continues to operate during the pendency of the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
DEEPAK CHHABRA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr V.P. Rana, Advocate.
versus
ANIL GOEL & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Anil Sharma, Mr Gagan Kumar and Mr Sankalp Mishra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 29.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
1.1 In other words, the appellant wishes to prosecute the suit action, with the interim order passed by this Court continuing to operate in the meanwhile.
FAO(OS) 82/2018
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:00:24
4.1 Therefore, Mr V.P. Rana, counsel who appears for subsequent purchasers, i.e., respondent nos. 4 to 6 says that the interim order dated 21.05.2018 can be extended to respondent nos. 4 to 6.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 29, 2024 at
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
FAO(OS) 82/2018
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:00:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order passed by the coordinate bench can be extended to subsequent purchasers added later as respondents.
DEEPAK CHHABRA
ANIL GOEL
SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
