Partly allowed
Ravinder Singh v. Ms. Nitisha
Delhi HCMAT.APP.(F.C.)/295/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
RAVINDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr Ravi Ranjan, Advocate
versus
MS. NITISHA .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 06.09.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 52035/2024
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 295/2024 & CM Appls. 52034/2024 & 52036/2024
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 /ds
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:29:33
RAVINDER SINGH
MS. NITISHA
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court