The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal order because the appellant sought to withdraw it after settling the decretal amount with the respondent. Pending applications were closed and the court fee was to be refunded.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications closed. Court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
M/S NAVEEN GARMENTS .....Appellant Through: Mr Manish Kumar, Adv. versus M/S MITTAL FABRICS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 / aj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:31:05
M/S Naveen Garments
M/S Mittal Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
