Allowed

Sh. Jagmeet Singh Makkar & Anr. v. M/S. Ozone Spa Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Sept 2024EFA(OS)/16/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An allowed appeal against an order directing judgment debtors to disclose assets. The division bench granted the appellants an opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's application before proceeding further.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed; opportunity granted to appellants to file a reply to respondent's application; matter remitted to Single Judge to consider reply.

Sh. Jagmeet Singh Makkar & Anr. Vs M/S. Ozone Spa Pvt… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~38

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- EFA(OS) 16/2024 & CM APPL. 51560/2024

¶4

SH. JAGMEET SINGH MAKKAR & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr M G Vacher, Ms Sanjela Gupta, & Mr Harsh Vardhan, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S. OZONE SPA PVT. LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Rajesh Mahendra, Adv. for R1.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R

¶8

% 05.09.2024

¶9

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

¶10

CM APPL. 51561/2024

¶11

Allowed, subject to the appellant filing legible copies of the annexures, at least three (03) days before the next date of hearing.

¶12

EFA(OS) 16/2024 & CM APPL. 51560/2024

¶13

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 06.08.2024, passed by the learned Single Judge.

¶14

Mr M G Vacher, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellants i.e., judgment debtors 2&3, says that the directions concerning disclosure of assets have been issued by the learned Single Judge without giving an opportunity to the appellants to file a reply.

¶15

According to us, that does not seem to be the purport of the impugned judgment and order dated 06.08.2024.

¶16

EFA(OS) 16/2024

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:08:44

¶19

4.1 Since notice has been issued, quite logically, the appellants i.e., judgment debtors 2&3 would have an opportunity to file a reply.

¶20

The impugned judgment and order seems to be indicative of certain information that has been sought which, in any case, the Court is empowered to do.

¶21

Nevertheless, we are inclined to dispose of the appeal, granting opportunity to the appellants i.e., judgement debtors 2&3 to file a reply to the subject application i.e. EX. APPL. (OS) 1200/24 preferred by the respondent no. 1/decree holder.

¶22

6.1 The reply would be filed within the next three (03) weeks.

¶23

6.2 Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing.

¶24

Since the subject application is listed before the learned Single Judge on 06.12.2024, learned Single Judge will consider the reply before proceeding further in the matter.

¶25

The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

Pending application shall stand closed.

¶27

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

¶28

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶29

SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 / Ch

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

EFA(OS) 16/2024

¶32

Page 2 of 2

¶33

Sh. Jagmeet Singh Makkar & Anr. v. M/S. Ozone Spa Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh. Jagmeet Singh Makkar & Anr. v. M/S. Ozone Spa Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Arora Vs Disha @ Durga

Tejinder Singh Vs Beverley Singh

Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Vs M/S Satinder Mahajan

Harjeet Kaur Vs Jasneet Singh

Matsya Fincap Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rehmatullah and Anr.

Matsya Fincap Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rehmatullah and Anr.