Rahul Verma v. Isha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant. However, the court granted liberty to the appellant to approach the concerned court to pay arrears in instalments, subject to law.
What did the court decide?
The appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach the concerned court for payment of arrears in instalments as per law.
What the court decided
$~60
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 15/2024 and CM APPLs. 1900-02/2024 RAHUL VERMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Jitender Kumar, Advocate.
- versus
ISHA ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
- % 11.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
- The limited plea that the counsel for the appellant makes qua the impugned judgment dated 07.08.2023 is that the appellant should have some leeway to pay the arrears in instalments.
- 1.1 Accordingly, counsel for the appellant says that he would withdraw the appeal, with liberty to make a request to the concerned court for paying the arrears in instalments.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rahul Verma
- respondent
Isha
Coram
Rajiv Shakdher
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court