The High Court of Delhi dismissed a miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn by the appellant. The pending concomitant applications were subsequently closed consequentially.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
ASHEEMA KHANNA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Prateek Kumar, Mr Yojit Pareek and Ms Aarushi Jain, Advs.
versus
NISHANT SAINI ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 10.01.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
withdraw the above-captioned appeal, with liberty to take recourse to an appropriate remedy, as per law.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 10, 2024 aj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:58:36
ASHEEMA KHANNA
NISHANT SAINI
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
