High Court upheld closure of matrimonial appeal as infructuous due to appellant's remarriage following respondent's decree granting divorce. No substantive decision on merits observed.
Appel and pending application closed and dismissed as infructuous due to remarriage of appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
REKHA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Umesh Mishra, Adv.
versus
SANJAY SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rajesh Pathak, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
2.1 The record also discloses that the respondent had filed a counter-claim under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Act.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 124/2016 page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:19:04
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 12, 2024 aj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 124/2016
page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:19:04
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rekha Sharma
Sanjay Sharma
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
