Husband's appeal against the Family Court order dismissing his application to modify or set aside a maintenance order was dismissed; the High Court found no reason to interfere and restored the earlier dismissed-for-non-prosecution appeal before dismissing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
versus
ADRIJA DEVI .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 19.07.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 31414/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:38:53
recission /setting aside of the order of maintenance passed by it via order dated 31.05.2023.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 19, 2024 /rt
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 140/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 02:38:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's dismissal of the husband's application for modification/recission of the maintenance order dated 31.05.2023 should be interfered with.
Ajayan Pillai
Adrija Devi
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
