The appellant appeared through counsel and stated that the matter had been amicably settled. The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal, and the respondent was permitted to withdraw the fixed deposit amount along with interest. The appeal was disposed of as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
PA SALES CORPORATION THR ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
ASHISH GOEL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Khorana, Advocate (through VC). versus
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Pinky Pawar and Mr. Akash Pathak, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 12.07.2024 FAO 322/2016 & CM APPL. 38867/2024
FAO 322/2016 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:46:15
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 12, 2024/ sw
FAO 322/2016 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:46:15
PA Sales Corporation Thru Its Sole Proprietor Ashish Goel
Union of India
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
