The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, because the appellant's counsel stated they would file a review application instead and did not press the current appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~98
ALOPI PRASHAD ALIAS AALOPI PRASHAD AND ORS
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. R.K. Nain and Mr. Chandan Prajapati, Advocates.
versus
K K SYNTHETIC AND ELASTIC YARN & ANR.
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
% 09.09.2024 CM APPL. 52342/2024 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
FAO 287/2024
FAO 287/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:38:48
seeking review in accordance with law and if any such application is moved by the appellant, the learned Commissioner would consider the same and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
MANOJ JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ss
FAO 287/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:38:48
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alopi Prasad Alias Aalopi Prasad and Ors
K K Synthetic and Elastic Yarn and Anr
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
