Plaintiff challenged closure of his right to cross-examine DW-1. The High Court disposed of the petition directing the trial court to grant one effective opportunity for cross-examination of DW-1, subject to payment of Rs. 25,000 as cost to the respondent within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. I. Ahmed with Mr. S.D. Ansari, Advocates.
versus
RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mahender Shukla, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 1545/2023 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 9.09.2024 19:39:46
Court, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the learned Trial Court would give one effective opportunity to the plaintiff to cross examine DW-1. Subject to cost of Rs. 25,000/-.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ sw
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 1545/2023 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 9.09.2024 19:39:46
1 issue framed by the court
Should the plaintiff be granted one effective opportunity to cross-examine DW-1 after his right was closed, subject to costs?
Mohd. Rehan
Rajinder Kumar Sharma
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
