Writ petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order was withdrawn by the petitioner. The Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court, citing Supreme Court precedent on territorial jurisdiction, while reserving opinion on merits.
Liberty granted to withdraw petition and approach jurisdictional High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
NARAINDAS .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate (DHCLSC) with petitioner in person.
versus
TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 3279/2024 1
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.09.2024 15:08:31
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ sw
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed CM(M) 3279/2024 2 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.09.2024 15:08:31
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand MitterReferred¶11
Siddhartha S Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter, Civil Appeal Nos. 3915-16/2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NARAINDAS
TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
