Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the appellants' application under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC; counsel stated the suit property had been sold and the appeal had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~100
SHIV PRASAD PATHAK & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala with Mr.Karan Ahuja, Mr. Kuldeep Jauhari, Advocates. versus SMITA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 17.12.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 17, 2024/st
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 13:01:07
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Prasad Pathak
Smita
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
