Tilak Raj v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In two writ petitions, this Court disposed of the matter by directing the Delhi Development Authority to consider Section Officer recommendations for handing over flat possession within eight weeks, allowing petitions to be revived if the outcome is unsatisfactory.
What did the court decide?
Direction to DDA to consider SDM recommendations for possession of flats within eight weeks; liberty to revive petitions if aggrieved.
What the court decided
$~32&33
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 1682/2024 & CM APPL. 6970/2024 JAGDISH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ujala Vishnoi, Advocate (through VC).
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.
- .....Respondent
- Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, SC with Mr. Rony John, Advocates. Ms. Vrinda Kapoor with Ms. Saumya Soni and Mr. Vishal Vaid, Advocates.
- 33 + W.P.(C) 2062/2024 & CM APPL. 8600/2024 TILAK RAJ .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ujala Vishnoi, Advocate (through VC).
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, SC with Mr. Rony John, Advocates. Ms. Nanda Devi Deka with Mr. Shashwat, Advocates.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the DDA must consider the SDM's positive recommendations regarding possession of flats in a time-bound manner.
Whether the petitioners should be granted liberty to revive the petitions in case of dissatisfaction with the DDA's decision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagdish Kumar
- petitioner
Tilak Raj
- respondent
Delhi Development Authority
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court