Suit for partition settled. Court recorded a settlement agreement regarding shares in specific Delhi properties and decreed the suit accordingly as disposed.
Suit decreed and disposed of in terms of the recorded settlement agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
NEERAJ GURNANI ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Ritesh Sareen, Adv.
versus
RAVI GURNANI & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Auluck, Advocate for D-4 and 5 with Defendants in person (M: 9999903936).
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 15.05.2024
2. This is a suit for partition filed by the Plaintiff- Neeraj Gurnani. Parties have resolved their disputes vide settlement agreement dated 9th May, 2024. Properties in question are –
3. In terms of the settlement agreement, it has been agreed that the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 each shall have one sixth share in the said properties. The Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 and 3 have agreed to waive their rights under the Will dated 24th August, 2005 in respect of property bearing no. E- 380 Ramesh Nagar New Delhi .
CS(OS) 682/2023
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 22:03:03
4. The settlement terms and conditions are contained in paragraphs 1 to 17 of the settlement agreement. Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 are present in Court. They have confirmed having settled their disputes and having signed the agreement. The agreement is also signed by the parties as also the ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendants and the ld. Mediator.
5. The Court is convinced that the terms of the settlement agreement are lawful. There is no impediment in recording the same.
6. The suit is accordingly decreed in terms of the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement shall form part of the decree.
7. Accordingly, the suit is disposed of as settled, along with all pending applications, if any.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 15, 2024 mr/ks
CS(OS) 682/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 22:03:03
Ravi Gurnani
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
