Claimant sought extension of arbitral tribunal's mandate; proceedings at final arguments stage with respondent absent. Court extended arbitrator's mandate by three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
M/S MODERN SR SEC SCHOOL ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 14.05.2024
I.A. 10913/2024 (for exemption)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:19:12
of Petitioner is stated to be completed on 28th March, 2023.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MAY 14, 2024 Rahul/rks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:19:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Safari Digital Education Initiatives Pvt Ltd
M/S Modern Sr Sec School
Prathiba M. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
