Disposed

Supreme Infrastructure India Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC14 May 2024O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/44/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi appointed Justice Ravindra Bhat as the sole arbitrator to replace Justice A.M. Khanwilkar (Retd.), who expressed unavailability, under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The parties concurred with the fresh appointment.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Justice Ravindra Bhat as the sole Arbitrator; petition disposed of with all pending applications.

Supreme Infrastructure India Limited Vs Union of India & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 44/2024 and I.A. 10903/2024

¶4

SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. B. Rangaswamy, Adv. with Ms. Rashi Mangal, GP (M: 8384924556).

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

¶8

O R D E R % 14.05.2024

¶9

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶10

This is a petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Supreme Infrastructure India Limited under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, ‘ the Act ’) seeking appointment of a substitute ld. sole Arbitrator. The dispute in present case relates to contract agreement dated 9th February, 2011 construction of Dwelling Units at Barrackpore, Kancharapara, Kankinara, West Bengal for a value of more than Rs.71 crores.

¶11

According to the Petitioner, the construction was to be completed in four phases out of which three phases have been completed. It is stated that the Petitioner encountered various obstacles at the work site, causing delays in completion and the same were reported to the Respondent. It is averred that requests for extensions were made by the Petitioner and were granted by

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 44/2024

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:27:55

¶15

the Respondent, acknowledging the reasons for the delays. Vide letter dated 19th August 2017, the Petitioner informed the Respondent of the difficulties faced and requested further extension, despite the project being 90% complete. However, on 23rd January, 2018, the Respondent indicated an intent to terminate the contract due to the expiry of the extended Period for Defects Correction. Thereafter, in another letter dated 19th February, 2018, the Respondent granted an extension to the Petitioner for completion of work until 5th March, 2018. Eventually on 5th March, 2018, the Respondent is stated to have terminated the contract leading to the dispute between the parties. Thereafter, a petition under Section 11 of the Act was filed and vide order dated 6th July, 2023, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar (Retd.) was appointed as ld. Sole Arbitrator in this matter.

¶16

Ld. Arbitrator entered reference and few proceedings took place. The statement of claim was filed and a statement of defense was to be filed. At that stage, vide letter dated 28th February, 2024, ld. Arbitrator expressed his unavailability to continue as ld. Arbitrator in the said matter. In view thereof, the present petition has been filed.

¶17

Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that a new substitute Arbitrator may be appointed. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents has no objection in appointment of a fresh ld. Arbitrator. Accordingly , Justice Ravindra Bhat (M: 9818000160) is appointed as a ld. Sole Arbitrator, on the same terms.

¶18

Parties to appear before the ld. Sole Arbitrator on 5th July, 2024.

¶19

Petition is disposed of with all pending applications, if any.

¶20

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶21

MAY 14, 2024/ mr/bh

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 44/2024

¶24

Supreme Infrastructure India Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Supreme Infrastructure India Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Capital Limited Vs M/S Prime Bizworld Private Limited & Ors.

Union of India Vs Inderjit Mehta Constructions Private Limited

M/S Shri Ram Electrial Works Vs Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

M/S Dps Construction Vs Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd.

M/S Safari Digital Education Initiatives Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Modern Sr Sec School

Saeed Akhtar Zaidi and Another Vs Iqbal Akhtar Zaidi and Othres