Allowed
Anita Anand v. Gargi Kapur & Ors.
Delhi HCCS(OS)/3489/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application filed on behalf of defendant Nos.2 and 3 in a civil suit seeking directions was allowed by the Delhi High Court in terms of the prayer made.
What did the court decide?
Application of defendant Nos.2 and 3 allowed in terms of the prayer made therein.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~O-40
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 3489/2014
¶4
ANITA ANAND
¶5
.....Plaintiff
¶6
Through: Mr. Rishabh Bansal and Ms. Sakshi Pareek, Advs.
¶7
versus
¶8
GARGI KAPUR & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Ritik Duggal, Adv. for the applicant.
¶9
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶10
O R D E R
¶11
% 06.02.2025 I.A. 3188/2025 (filed on behalf of defendant Nos.2 and 3 seeking direction)
¶12
- Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and for the reasons disclosed in the application, the same stands allowed in terms of the prayer.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Anita Anand
- respondent
Gargi Kapur
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court