Suit dismissed for non-prosecution after plaintiff repeatedly failed to lead evidence, serve summons on witnesses or pay imposed costs; no appearance on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
Through: None
versus
VINAY KUMAR & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rajan, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1-5 & 8
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 08.11.2024
“Heard. Perusal of record would show that no steps have been taken by the plaintiff in terms of order dated 24.08.2022 despite last and final opportunity. No receipt of payment of previous total cost of Rs.8,000/with Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Many opportunities have already been granted to the plaintiff for examining his remaining witnesses. In the present facts
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/11/2024 at 11:08:08
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
NOVEMBER 8, 2024
RJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/11/2024 at 11:08:08
B.K. Jewellery House Marketing Pvt Ltd
Vinay Kumar & Ors
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
