Allowed

Mr Keshavamurthy Ramaiah v. Urological Society of India through Its President & Ors.

Delhi HC11 Nov 2024CS(OS)/888/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application for exemption under Section 151 CPC. It disposed of the ex-parte injunction application after recording a statement that the suit was premature. The plaintiff subsequently withdrew the suit with liberty to challenge the final order and the impugned constitutional amendment.

What did the court decide?

I.A. 44631/2024 allowed. I.A. 44630/2024 disposed; suit withdrawn with liberty to challenge final order and amendment in subsequent suit.

Mr Keshavamurthy Ramaiah Vs Urological Society of India… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 888/2024

¶4

MR KESHAVAMURTHY RAMAIAH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. M. Veerbhadriah, Ms. Rajshri Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Amit P. Shahi and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates.

¶5

versus UROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Pran Bora, Senior Advocate with Mrs. Anasuya Choudhury, Advocate for D-1 & 2. Mr. Tushar Bhushan, Advocate for D-3.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 11.11.2024

¶7

I.A.No.44631/2024 ( by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC for exemption )

¶8

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application stands disposed of.

¶10

CS(OS) 888/2024 & I.A.No.44630/2024 (by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of CPC for grant of ad-interim ex-parte injunction)

¶11

The plaint be registered as suit.

¶12

Issue summons/notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant nos.1 and 2 as well as for defendant no.3 accepts summons/notice and waive formal service.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff submits that he is

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:20:20

¶16

contesting for the post of President Elect of the Urological Society of India. He submits that the election was notified vide notification dated 30.06.2024. The plaintiff had filed his nomination and vide e-mail dated 15.10.2024, defendant no.1 had at about 8:56 P.M. released the list of contestants which included the name of the plaintiff as one of the four candidates who were contesting for the post of President Elect.

¶17

He submits that the plaintiff has been served with a show cause notice dated 30.10.2024 premised on the complaints made by defendant nos.3 and 4, wherein it has been alleged that there was a violation of code of conduct.

¶18

He submits that the allegation in the complaints is that the plaintiff has been campaigning on social media after 5:00 PM on 15.10.2024 despite there being an embargo in the notification not to campaign on social media after the stipulated time. He submits that the show cause notice is not legally tenable, inter alia, for the following reasons:

¶19

(i) firstly , the list of candidates was notified on 15.10.2024 at 8:56 PM therefore, by that time, the plaintiff was not aware as to the status of his candidature as President Elect.

¶20

(ii) secondly , the campaign was being done by the plaintiff only through whatsapp which is not a social media.

¶21

(iii) thirdly , the amendment which provides for such an embargo was inserted by way of an amendment in the Constitution of defendant no.1 Society but the same has not been notified to the Registrar of Societies, in terms of Section 4 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

¶22

(iv) fourthly , before carrying out amendment, the procedure prescribed in the Constitution was not followed, inasmuch as no agenda was circulated nor prior communication to the members was given.

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:20:20

¶25

On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant nos.1 and 2 submits that the present suit is premature, inasmuch as only show cause notice has been given to which the plaintiff has responded vide his reply dated 31.10.2024, however, no final decision has been taken yet.

¶26

He submits that the decision will be taken and communicated to the plaintiff within a period of one week from today. He further clarifies that till the time the decision is taken, there is no bar on the plaintiff to continue with his campaign in terms of the Constitution. The statement is taken on record. 10. In view of the above statement, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff does not wish to press the present suit and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to challenge the final order passed by the competent authority on the show cause notice dated 30.10.2024. He further prays for liberty to challenge the impugned amendment made in the Constitution of the Society, in the subsequent suit as well.

¶27

The suit is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶28

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶29

NOVEMBER 11, 2024 aj

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:20:20

Mr Keshavamurthy Ramaiah v. Urological Society of India through Its President & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Keshavamurthy Ramaiah v. Urological Society of India through Its President & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pijush Kanti Das Vs Pradeep Kumar Das

B.K. Jewellery House Marketing Pvt. Tld Vs Vinay Kumar & Ors.

Sunil Ashra Vs Ram Kishor Ashra & Ors.

Uttam Singh Vs Kamla Devi and Ors.

Smt Usha Magoo Vs Smt Neelam Bhola Since Deceased through Lrs & Ors.

Dushyant Chikara Vs Zeeshan Ali and Anr.

Anjali Khosla Vs Arun Ahuja & Ors.

Shri Atul Chander Paul & Anr. Vs Smt. Satish Paul & Ors.

Uttam Singh Vs Kamla Devi and Ors.

Monica Gogia Vs M S Rss Estate LLP & Anr.

M/S R.S.S. Estate LLP Vs Monica Gogia

M/S Drake and Scull Water and Energy India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Cobra Instalaciones Y Services Sa

Applause Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Kamla Devi Vs Jai Bhagwan & Ors.