Petitioner invoked Clause 14 of a loan agreement and issued a Section 21 notice for unpaid loan dues; respondent did not reply. The Court appointed Pritish Sabharwal as sole arbitrator, with proceedings before DIAC, leaving all claims open.
Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate, appointed sole Arbitrator; arbitration under DIAC aegis and fee schedule.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
versus
NACHIKET SUBHASH BARI .....Respondent Through: (Advocate) Appearance not given
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R % 08.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:08:38
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
NOVEMBER 8, 2024 RJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:08:38
1 issue framed by the court
Should an arbitrator be appointed under Section 11(6) to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement where arbitration was invoked by notice?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Axis Finance Limited
Nachiket Subhash Bari
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
