Allowed

Usms Saffron Co. Inc. v. Gulzar Ahmed Bhat Trading as M/S Gulzar Products and Ors.

Delhi HC12 Nov 2024CS(COMM)/285/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi allowed the plaintiff's suit by decreeing it in terms of a settlement agreement reached at mediation. The court ordered full refund of court fees under Section 89 CrPC and disposed of pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed per settlement terms; 100% court fees refund ordered; pending applications disposed of.

Usms Saffron Co. Inc. Vs Gulzar Ahmed Bhat Trading as M/S Gulzar… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 285/2023 & I.A. 8807-8808/2023

¶4

USMS SAFFRON CO INC .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

GULZAR AHMED BHAT TRADING AS M/S GULZAR PRODUCTS AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Towseef Ahmad Dar, Mr. Malik Ifshana and Mr. Amit Masih, Advocates for D-1 & 2

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 12.11.2024

¶8

The counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled the dispute in mediation proceedings before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (‘Mediation Centre’).

¶9

The Settlement Agreement dated 24^th September, 2024, (hereinafter the “Settlement Agreement”) has been placed on record and the same bears the electronic signatures of the authorised representative of the plaintiff and the defendants.

¶10

I have perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement and do not find anything unlawful therein.

¶11

It is stated that the defendants have complied with the clauses 7.4 and 7.5 of the Settlement Agreement.

¶12

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

CS(COMM) 285/2023

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:49:54

¶16

Agreement.

¶17

In terms of the Settlement Agreement, the present suit is decreed in terms of prayers sought in paragraph 48 (a) (i) to (iv) of the plaint. The Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree.

¶18

Let the decree sheet be drawn up.

¶19

In view of the fact that the matter has been settled at the Mediation Centre, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the Plaintiff, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶20

All pending applications stand disposed of.

¶21

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶22

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

Page 2 of 2

CS(COMM) 285/2023

Usms Saffron Co. Inc. v. Gulzar Ahmed Bhat Trading as M/S Gulzar Products and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Usms Saffron Co. Inc. v. Gulzar Ahmed Bhat Trading as M/S Gulzar Products and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ttk Prestige Ltd. Vs Mr Gurmeet Singh

Sandhu Family Private Trust Vs Ms Sharnarthi Finance Ltd. and Ors.

Vishal Monga Vs Lakshay Sehgal & Ors.

M/S. Resbird Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. R.S. Travel & Tours (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Verizon Trademark Services Llc & Ors. Vs Verizon Global & Ors.

G6 Hospitality Ip Llc Vs Future Gaming and Hotel Services Private Limited

Sandisk Llc Vs R D Telecom and Anr.

M.K. Srinivasan and Another Vs Chemsol India and Another

Siemens Enterprise Communications Gmbh and Co. Kg Vs Controller General of Patents and Designs and Anr.

Vishal Monga Vs Lakshay Sehgal & Ors.

Sterlite Technologies Limited Vs Ztt India Private Limited

Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr.

Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr.

Tempus Gems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asian Hobby Crafts LLP and Anr.