Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellant's non-appearance despite prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SIEMENS ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATIONS
GMBH AND CO. KG
.....Appellant
Through: None versus CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon, CGSC, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 11.11.2024
AMIT BANSAL, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2024 Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:09:08
SIEMENS ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATIONS GMBH AND CO. KG
CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
ANR
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
