Disposed

Premier Nutritions Private Limited (Formerly Known as Indrajit Solar Power Pvt. Ltd.) v. Manthan Milk Food Industries & Ors.

Delhi HC16 Oct 2024CS(COMM)/285/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the present suit after the parties executed a settlement agreement regarding trademark infringement. The court found the settlement lawful and decreed the suit against the defendants in terms of the agreement.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed against defendants in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 10th September, 2024.

Premier Nutritions Private Limited (Formerly Known as… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~35

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 285/2022 & I.A. 11010/2022, I.A. 7044/2023

¶4

PREMIER NUTRITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDRAJIT SOLAR POWER PVT. LTD.) .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pushkar Karni Sinha, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

MANTHAN MILK FOOD INDUSTRIES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Mr. Raghav Bhalla & Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates. (M:9818558690)

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 16.10.2024

¶11

Settlement Agreement dated 10^th September, 2024 has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

¶12

The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction and damages for infringement of registered trademarks, passing off, unfair competition, declaration, rendition of accounts and other reliefs.

¶13

Vide order dated 10^th May, 2022, an interim injunction was passed against the defendants.

¶14

The present matter was referred to mediation vide order dated 21st November, 2023, wherein, parties have successfully negotiated a settlement and executed Settlement Agreement dated 10^th September, 2024.

¶15

Learned counsels for the parties present before the Court confirm the terms of the settlement and pray that the suit be decreed accordingly.

¶16

This Court has perused the terms of the settlement and finds the same to be lawful.

¶17

In terms of the settlement, the defendants have admitted the plaintiff

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:01:27

¶19

to be the owner and proprietor of the trade mark “MANTHAN” with respect to the goods, i.e., milk, milk products, skimmed milk powder, dairy products etc. included in Class 29.

¶20

The defendants undertake not to use the trademark “MANTHAN” either in isolation or in conjunction with any other trade mark for the aforesaid goods included in Class 29.

¶21

The defendants have also stopped using its trading name ‘Manthan Milk Food Industries’. 10. Subsequent to the interim order dated 10^th May, 2022 passed by this Court, the defendants have changed their name to ‘Melco Milk Food Industries’ and is using the said trading name to carry out the business of selling the above goods included in Class 29.

¶22

Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, in terms of the settlement as well as in terms of prayer (i), (ii) and (iii) of Para 43 of the plaint, which shall form part of the decree.

¶23

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement.

¶24

In view of the fact that the parties have entered into a settlement, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of full court fees in favour of the plaintiff.

¶25

Let the decree sheet be drawn up.

¶26

The suit, along with pending applications, is accordingly disposed of.

¶27

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶28

OCTOBER 16, 2024 au

¶29

Premier Nutritions Private Limited (Formerly Known as Indrajit Solar Power Pvt. Ltd.) v. Manthan Milk Food Industries & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Premier Nutritions Private Limited (Formerly Known as Indrajit Solar Power Pvt. Ltd.) v. Manthan Milk Food Industries & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Itv Studios Netherlands Content B v Vs Voice of Mithila

Phonographic Performance Limited Vs Parveen Kumar & Anr.

Red Bull Ag & Anr. Vs Sumeet Gupta Trading as Hygen Agro & Anr.

Ipas & Anr. Vs Parkash Enterprises & Anr.

M/S Blue Heaven Cosmetics Private Limited Vs Bhcosmetics Llc

Calvin Klein Trademark Trust Vs Mr. Bhagat & Ors.

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Vs Synergic Pharma through Mr Sumir Kumar Proprietor & Anr.

Designarch Infrastructure Private Limited Vs Lotus Greens Constructions Private Limited & Anr.

Rajesh Mehta & Anr. Vs Oakley Inc.

Itv Studios Netherlands Content B v Vs Voice of Mithila

Bentley Systems Inc. & Anr. Vs Pushparaj Kandaswamy & Anr.

Havells India Limited Vs Electromech India Private Limited & Anr.

Tv Today Network Limited & Anr. Vs Backgrid Usa Inc. & Ors.

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. Vs Lincoln Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr.